Legal Opinion

People v. Grazer

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 4, 1956No. Civ. 8670PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

Respondent herein is the executrix of the will of Martel Grazer, deceased. The state filed a claim against the estate for sales taxes which it claimed to be due and unpaid, arising out of the business of decedent in conducting what is known as a lay X-ray laboratory. The claim was disallowed and this action followed. From a judgment in favor of the estate the People appeal.

Martel Grazer for many years prior to his death conducted a business under the designation “Physicians X-ray Service,” the principal work done being the furnishing of X-ray pic tures called “radiographs,” together with, in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Maranville v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Preston v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Evco v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Gibbons & Reed Co. v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Levine v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Albers v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API