People v. Puritan Ice Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
These causes consist of five actions, one by the State, appellant, to recover sales taxes alleged to be due under the Retail Sales Tax Act (Stats. 1933, p. 2599; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 8493; now in Revenue & Taxation Code, §§ 6001-7176), and four actions by respondent for refund of taxes paid under protest. The respondent was successful in all of the actions and hence, we must view the evidence in a light most favorable to it.
Respondent is in the business of manufacturing and selling ice. Its business, in the instant cases, embraces two classes of buyers of its product, both of which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Union League Club v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- National Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Standard Oil Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. Monterey County Ice & Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
3Cited by17 opinions
- Flood v. RiggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Dami v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Hammond v. HickelAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Fahey v. City Council of City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.