Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Jenkins

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14398PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

On March 14, 1927, plaintiff directed the defendant Logan & Bryan, a copartnership engaged in the stock brokerage business in the city and county of San Francisco and elsewhere, and a member of the San Francisco Stock and Bond Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange and other exchanges in the United States, with its principal office in the city of New York, to purchase for him 500 shares of the preferred stock of the Julian Petroleum Corporation, at a price not to exceed $12 per share, with the instruction to said brokers, so he testified, to keep it subject to his order, as he was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tupman v. HaberkernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Poggi v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Swim v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Henning v. AkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. George v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Krusi v. Bear, Stearns & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Gates v. Trans Video Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Dep't of Indus. Relations v. UI Video Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API