Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Standard Accident Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 14587PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Appeal by defendant from judgment for plaintiff in an action to recover upon a broker’s bond. The main question to be determined is whether or not the transaction upon which the cause of action is based was a “brokerage” transaction within the meaning of the Corporate Securities Act and covered by the bond issued in accordance with the requirements of said act (sec. 5, Corporate Securities Act, as amended in 1925, Stats. 1925, p. 967).

The amended complaint alleged that on December 6, 1926, J. Arthur Snowden, doing business as The J. Arthur Snowden Company, as principal, and defendant, as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Merrick Et Al. v. N. W. Halsey & Company Et Al., and the Weis Fibre Container CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Caldwell v. Sioux Falls Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Michigan Trust Co. v. BronsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Betzer v. OlneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Municipal Bond & Investment Co. v. KnottSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Roberts, Thomas & Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API