People v. La Barre
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
This is a proceeding in quo warranto instituted by the people of the state of California, upon the relation of George D. Gillespie, to remove from office, on the ground of ineligibility, the five members of the state board of chiropractic examiners appointed by the Governor of the state acting, it is claimed, within the power conferred upon him by the initiative measure approved at the general election held November 7, 1922, effective December 21, 1922 (Stats, and Amendts. 1923, p. lxxxviii).
The trial court found said appointees to be wanting in the legal qualifications necessary to entitle…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Doscher v. . SissonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Robertson v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- State ex rel. Smith v. Board of Dental ExaminersWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re MadalinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Gleason v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Laughlin v. Washington State Bar Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Felt v. WaughopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Sparkman v. State Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Garvai v. Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.