Legal Opinion

Sparkman v. State Board of Bar Examiners

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1967No. 8202PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENSLEY, Chief Judge, Court of Appeals.

The petitioner seeks to review and to reverse a ruling of the Board of Bar Examiners.

In September, 1964, the petitioner applied for admission to practice law in New Mexico on motion. The' application was denied and the two reasons assigned therefor were as follows:(1) No exceptional circumstances were presented that would warrant waiving the requirement of examination, and(2) The applicant has not actively and continuously practiced law in any other state for seven of the eight years immediately preceding the filing of his application, three years…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Auerbacher v. WoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  3. Rask v. Board of Bar ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State Ex Rel. Junior Ass'n of the Milwaukee Bar v. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In re PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Credit Bureau of Albuquerque, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Ex Rel. Frieson v. IsnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re Application of Mark W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. State Bar v. Guardian Abstract & Title Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re HuntleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API