Legal Opinion

Felt v. Waughop

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1924No. S. F. No. 11133PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, C. J.

Petitioner brings this proceeding as a resident, elector, and taxpayer of the city of Long Beach to procure a writ of mandate against the respondents respectively, city clerk and members of the city council of said city, to compel the city clerk to certify a new and correct list of candidates for the office of city attorney of said city to be voted for at an election to toe held therein on the thirteenth day of May, 1924, by including in said list the names of two candidates who have complied with all the requirements of the provisions of the city charter relating to the signing and filing of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Bordwell v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State ex rel. Duffel v. MarksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
  4. People v. La BarreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Gorder v. ConnorNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Knoll v. DavidsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Gage v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. McIntosh v. AubryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API