Wright v. Engram
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review the determination of the sufficiency of a recall petition. Denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Carr & Kennedy and Chenoweth & Leininger for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The petitioner has filed an application for a writ of certiorari to review the action of the defendant Engram, as city clerk of the city of Redding, in determining that a certain petition filed in the office of said clerk for the recall of certain of the city trustees of said city is sufficient to authorize a recall election, as provided in section 1 of the act of January 2, 1912, providing for the recall of elective-officers of incorporated cities and towns. (Stats. (Ex. Sess.) 1911, p. 128.)
[1] We are satisfied that the action required of the clerk by that act is not judicial in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baines v. ZemanskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Fickert v. J. H. ZemanskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Whittemore v. SeydelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Boggs v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Ratto v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Hartsock v. MerrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Chambers v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.