Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1922No. Civ. No. 2455PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to compel the certification of a petition for the recall of directors of an irrigation district. Denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

By an original application to this court petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to require the secretary of the board of directors of said district to certify to the sufficiency of a certain alleged petition filed with him for the recall of the directors and also to require the board to call an election based on such petition. It may be stated that, of the three directors sought to be recalled, one has died and another has resigned and their successors have been chosen since the petition was presented to the secretary. A demurrer on various grounds has been filed by the Irrigation District and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chester v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Wright v. EngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Uhl v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Boggs v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. City of BelmontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Carter v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Gray v. KennyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API