Legal Opinion

Fickert v. J. H. Zemansky

California Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1917No. S. F. No. 8544. In BankPublishedCited by 9 opinions

. APPLICATION for a Writ of Review to be directed against J. H. Zemansky, Registrar of Voters of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiff filed in this court an application for a writ of review to annul a certificate of the sufficiency of a petition for his recall as district attorney, issued by the defendant Zemansky, as registrar of voters of the city and county of San Francisco, and asking that in the meantime, and until the hearing of his application, the board of election commissioners of said city and county be restrained from calling such election. An order upon the defendants to show cause why an alternative writ of review should not issue was thereupon made. The matter has been presented and submitted to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Whitney v. Board of Delegates of San Francisco Fire DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Central Pacific Railroad v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Baines v. ZemanskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Morley v. ElkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. People v. BurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker v. LenhartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Winning v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Luckey v. Superior Court of Los Angeles Cty.California Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Ludolph v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Fraser v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API