Legal Opinion
Whittemore v. Seydel
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 22, 1946No. Civ. No. 7226PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Petitioners herein sought a referendum against Ordinance No. 349 adopted and published by the council of the city of Chico on June 29, 1945. The ordinance was one fixing a license tax upon admissions to places of amusement within the city. Chico is a charter city, the charter having been approved by the Legislature in 1923, and section 116' of the charter provides that the laws of the State of California providing for the initiative referendum and recall in cities are made a part thereof and that all actions thereunder shall be taken in accordance with said laws.
Within thirty days after the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ley v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Harrigan v. Home Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Brill v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Chester v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stafford v. Los Angeles County Employees' Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Hunt v. Mayor & Council of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Martin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Jenkins v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.