Hartsock v. Merritt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
The petitioner has moved for a peremptory writ of mandate upon a petition which he has filed alleging that the respondent, as city clerk of the city of Oakland, has arbitrarily, and through coercion on the part of his superiors, fraudulently refused to certify as sufficient a petition filed with him asking for an election to vote upon the question of the recall of C. C. Young, one of the commissioners of said city. The respondent has filed a demurrer and answer at the same time and the cause has been submitted on briefs.
In support of the demurrer the respondent argues that his action in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Tulare Water Co. v. State Water CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Ratto v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Fraser v. CummingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Citizens Committee to Recall Rizzo v. Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Roberts v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
- Tilden v. BloodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hartsock v. MerrittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Solvang Municipal Improvement District v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.