Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. Dickinson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
The action is on a fire insurance policy. The insured sued the insurer for the full amount of the policy.
Defendant, among others, filed pleas 3 and 4, setting up an alleged forfeiture by taking out additional insurance. The policy stipulated the policy should be void in such event, unless permitted by agreement indorsed upon the policy.
Plaintiff filed a replication No. 2 to these pleas alleging a waiver of such forfeiture in that the policy contained a loss payable clause to one J. W. Kimbrough, mortgagee, as his interest should appear; and further alleging that Kimbrough, at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bennecke v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Rice v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Capital City Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Isom v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Continental Ins. Co. of New York v. RotholzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. CurtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Norwest Mortg., Inc. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Piedmont Fire Ins. Co. v. Fidelity Mtg. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- The Hudson Oil Company of Mobile, Inc. v. W. W. McLeod Mae J. McLeodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.