Continental Ins. Co. of New York v. Rotholz
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Action on a policy of fire insurance by the mortgagee of the owner. The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts which showed the policy was issued to R. W. Smith and insured buildings owned by him. The owner was indebted ,to the plaintiff appellee, and that indebtedness was secured by a mortgage. After the execution of the mortgage, defendant insurance company issued a policy to Smith which contained the following provision :
“This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void, if * * * with the knowledge of the insured, foreclosure…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Aetna Ins. v. HannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. WilbornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- &198tna Ins. Co. v. Baldwin Cty. Bldg. Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- 495 CORP. v. NJ Ins. Underwriting Ass'n.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Norwest Mortg., Inc. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.