Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. Dickinson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
This is the second appeal by the defendant, insurer, from a judgment for the plaintiff. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. Dickinson, 242 Ala. 107, 5 So.2d 90. On the first appeal the judgment was reversed for error committed in respect to the issue presented by the defendant’s pleas 3 and 4, and the plaintiff’s replication 2 thereto, and the oral charge of the court relating to that issue.
Said pleas 3 and 4 set up a forfeiture of the insurance resulting from a breach of the conditions of the policy against additional insurance without the written consent of the insurer…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Queen Insurance v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Alabama State Mutual Assurance Co. v. Long Clothing & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Washburn v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Great American Ins. Co. v. DoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Woodard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Lamar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Williams v. CallowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Birmingham Electric Co. v. Alabama Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.