Legal Opinion

Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. Dickinson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1943No. 1 Div. 188PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is the second appeal by the defendant, insurer, from a judgment for the plaintiff. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. Dickinson, 242 Ala. 107, 5 So.2d 90. On the first appeal the judgment was reversed for error committed in respect to the issue presented by the defendant’s pleas 3 and 4, and the plaintiff’s replication 2 thereto, and the oral charge of the court relating to that issue.

Said pleas 3 and 4 set up a forfeiture of the insurance resulting from a breach of the conditions of the policy against additional insurance without the written consent of the insurer…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Queen Insurance v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Alabama State Mutual Assurance Co. v. Long Clothing & Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Washburn v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Great American Ins. Co. v. DoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Marsh v. Elba Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Woodard v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Lamar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Williams v. CallowaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  4. Birmingham Electric Co. v. Alabama Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API