Piedmont Fire Ins. Co. v. Fidelity Mtg. Co. of Ala.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
This is a suit upon a policy of automobile collision insurance. On June 11, 1943, a policy of automobile collision insurance was issued by Piedmont Fire Insurance Company to W. H. Ezell. On that date Fidelity Mortgage Company of Alabama held a chattel mortgage on the automobile described in the policy which secured an indebtedness of $600.05. This indebtedness at the time of the trial was $411.85.
Fidelity Mortgage Company of Alabama is named as loss payee in the policy under what is termed a “loss payable clause”. This clause contains the following:
“This insurance as to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reed v. Firemen's InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Campbell Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. RaperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Trust Co. of St. Louis County v. Phoenix InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
- Home Ins. Co. of New York v. ScharnagelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Casualty Company v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. CurtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- American National Bank & Trust Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Norwest Mortg., Inc. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Simpson Sales Co. v. British General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.