Legal Opinion

Piedmont Fire Ins. Co. v. Fidelity Mtg. Co. of Ala.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1948No. 6 Div. 709PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

This is a suit upon a policy of automobile collision insurance. On June 11, 1943, a policy of automobile collision insurance was issued by Piedmont Fire Insurance Company to W. H. Ezell. On that date Fidelity Mortgage Company of Alabama held a chattel mortgage on the automobile described in the policy which secured an indebtedness of $600.05. This indebtedness at the time of the trial was $411.85.

Fidelity Mortgage Company of Alabama is named as loss payee in the policy under what is termed a “loss payable clause”. This clause contains the following:

“This insurance as to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reed v. Firemen's InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Campbell Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. RaperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  4. Trust Co. of St. Louis County v. Phoenix InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. ScharnagelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Casualty Company v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. New Hampshire Fire Insurance Co. v. CurtisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Norwest Mortg., Inc. v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Simpson Sales Co. v. British General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API