Legal Opinion

Slocum v. Peterson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1924No. 18512PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiffs, Slocum and wife, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking a decree quieting title in themselves to lots 11 to 20, inclusive, in block 1 of Powell’s North University Addition to the city of Seattle, as against the claim of title therein made by the defendants, Peterson and wife. The Klatawa Investment Com*62pany is also a party defendant to the action, but that company is merely the grantee in a conveyance taken by it in trust for Peterson and wife of a portion of the lots. We shall for convenience of expression discuss the case as though Slocum and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Finch v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Okanogan Power & Irrigation Co. v. QuackenbushWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Mizamore v. BerglinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Flint v. ConnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Riley v. VarianWashington Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Proceedings of King County Foreclosure of LiensWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. First National Bank of Seattle v. MapsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Butler v. WoodburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Pierce County v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Kallmeyer v. PooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API