Slocum v. Peterson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiffs, Slocum and wife, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking a decree quieting title in themselves to lots 11 to 20, inclusive, in block 1 of Powell’s North University Addition to the city of Seattle, as against the claim of title therein made by the defendants, Peterson and wife. The Klatawa Investment Com*62pany is also a party defendant to the action, but that company is merely the grantee in a conveyance taken by it in trust for Peterson and wife of a portion of the lots. We shall for convenience of expression discuss the case as though Slocum and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Finch v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Okanogan Power & Irrigation Co. v. QuackenbushWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Mizamore v. BerglinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Flint v. ConnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Riley v. VarianWashington Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Proceedings of King County Foreclosure of LiensWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- First National Bank of Seattle v. MapsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Butler v. WoodburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Pierce County v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Kallmeyer v. PooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.