Legal Opinion

Riley v. Varian

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1923No. 17493PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

This action was brought to set aside a tax deed. The trial resulted in a holding that proper notice had not been given to the record owner prior to the sale, and a judgment vacating and setting aside the tax deed. From this judgment, the defendants appeal.

The facts necessary to present the questions to be determined may be summarized as follows: On April 11,1918, the respondents acquired title to the property in question by deed from the Central Bank and Trust Company of Yakima, which deed was filed for record on the 31st day of May, 1918. In the year 1919, Yakima county brought an action in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Okanogan Power & Irrigation Co. v. QuackenbushWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Walter v. HoefflerWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Slocum v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Pierce County v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  3. City of Everett v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Sandberg v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Title and Trust Co. v. Columbia Basin Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API