Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Sauceda
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 5, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-2396-KHVPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion To Dismiss (Doc. # 8) filed October 7, 1999 by Melinda Sauceda, Delia M. York, and the Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, Kansas (“Unified Government”). 1 Defendants argue that plaintiffs complaint fails to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For reasons stated below, defendants’ motion is sustained.
Motions To Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6)
In ruling on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), the Court must assume as true all well pleaded facts in…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lymon v. Aramark Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Mosley v. TitusDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Saavedra v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Gose v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS OF COUNTY OF MCKINLEYDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- Youngblood v. QuallsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.