Wolff v. Commercial Waterway District No. 1
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
On November 18, 1924, a tax foreclosure judgment was entered foreclosing in the man ner provided by law the lien of delinquent and unpaid general taxes and, also, the amount of commercial waterway district No. 1 assessments against certain property in King county to the date of sale under the judgment. Pursuant to tax foreclosure sale, King county acquired title, in its name, to the land in question.
Thirteen years subsequent to acquisition by the county of title to the land in question, the county sold to Albert R. Wolff and wife a portion of that land for $435. At the time of this purchase,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Walla Walla v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Moe v. BrumfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. King County Water District v. StacyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bennett v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Tacoma v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1971