Legal Opinion

Moe v. Brumfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1935No. 25556. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

This action was brought to foreclose a lien for local improvements. To the complaint, as amended, a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiff refused to plead further and elected to stand upon his complaint. From the judgment entered dismissing the action, the plaintiff appeals.

Sometime prior to the year 1922, the city of Port Angeles created an improvement district for the purpose of improving certain streets of the city, for the payment of which it issued bonds, a number of which the appellant owns and in this action seeks to foreclose. There are here involved two lots…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maryland Realty Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. City of Tacoma v. Fletcher Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Walla Walla v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. King County v. OdmanWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Board of County Com'rs. v. Bench Canal Drainage Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Gengler v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Anderson v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API