Legal Opinion
Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 25, 1941No. 28371PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
Plaintiff Commercial Waterway District No. 1 of King county, which was organized many years ago under the provisions of Rem. Rev. Stat., § 9724 [P. C. § 1366] et seq., extensively improved the Duwamish river in King county, and the maximum benefits were duly assessed against adjacent real estate. Negotiable bonds and a considerable amount of con struction warrants were issued by the district in payment of the cost of the improvement. There are now outstanding bonds in excess of one hundred seventy-five thousand dollars and construction warrants in excess of ninety thousand dollars. The unpaid…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Potter v. City of New WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Gustaveson v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Douglas County v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Sasse v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- New York Security & Trust Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Washington Public Power Supply System v. General Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Bennett v. Grays Harbor CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Wash. State Major League Baseball Stadium Pfd v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- Washington State Major League Baseball Stadium Public Facilities District v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
- BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF CHOCTAW CO. v. SchuesslerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.