Legal Opinion
Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1938No. 27169. Department TwoPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
Commercial waterway district No. 1, of the county of King, state of Washington, one of the plaintiffs in this action, is a municipal corporation of the state of Washington, organized and existing pursuant to law. The district, some years since, improved the Duwamish river, a navigable stream in King county, and issued negotiable bonds in order to provide funds with which to pay for the improvement. Plaintiff Carl R. Heussy is the owner of one of these unpaid bonds.
In due course, the district levied against the land lying within its boundaries assessments in proportion to the benefits…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Love v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Gustaveson v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Gustaveson v. DwyerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Sasse v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Washington Public Power Supply System v. General Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. King County Water District v. StacyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Commercial Waterway District No. 1 v. LarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.