Legal Opinion
Feisthamel v. Campbell
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 1921No. Civ. No. 3741PublishedCited by 12 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiff was awarded judgment, for the recovery of a stock certificate representing certain corporate-shares, and defendant has appealed therefrom.
On the 13th of May, 1918, R. A. Moore was the owner of 1,900 shares of the capital stock of the Grant Tool Company. On that day he deposited a certificate representing the full number of shares mentioned with a banking corporation, for the purpose of having the same held in escrow subject to conditions which he stated in writing. These instructions so addressed to the bank directed- that the escrow-holder deliver the certificate to M. M.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pittsburg Vitrified Paving & Building Brick Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Cannon v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Clark v. CampbellUtah Supreme Court · 1901
- Bailey v. Security Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blackburn v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Caras v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Holman v. TotenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Chrisman v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Law v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.