Legal Opinion
Blackburn v. McCoy
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 1934No. Civ. 8024PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAHN, J., pro tem.
The action, which gives rise to the appeals which are before us, is one wherein the plaintiff brought suit to recover damages for the sum of $36,251.37, alleged to have been suffered by her by reason of losses sustained in a real estate transaction, in which she alleges she was induced to invest her money through fraudulent representations made to her by the defendants.
Plaintiff ■ had judgment against the defendants Edward A. Henderson, Lawrence C. Gilgen, Edward Arends and Walter Marte for the sum of $36,251.37, while judgment went for the defendants Frank McCoy, Florence…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Schmidt v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Chetwood v. California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- St. John v. HendricksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Hawber v. RaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Summit Financial Holdings, Ltd. v. Continental Lawyers Title Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Lamoreux v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Peterson Development Co. v. Torrey Pines BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Contini v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Berry v. McLeodArizona Supreme Court · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.