Cannon v. Handley
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This case comes before this court upon an agreed case under section 1138, Code of Civil Procedure. The facts agreed on are as follows: On the 8th of May, 1882, John J. Handley, Jr., and Catharine Handley were the owners in fee-simple and in possession of a lot of land situate in the city of Santa Cruz, known as lot five (5), in block Ho. two (2), and on that day executed a mortgage on the same, with other property, to the Santa Cruz Bank of Savings and Loan, as security for the payment of the sum of eighteen hundred dollars, maturing on the eighth day of May, 1885, with interest at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Rutenberg v. MainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- White v. DobsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1867
- Bebb v. PrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
- Washburn v. DeweySupreme Court of Vermont · 1843
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Simpson v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Shreeves v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- McDonald v. HuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Davis v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.