Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Security Trust Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1919No. L. A. No. 4754PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem.

This action was commenced by the plaintiff against the defendant Security Trust Company and certain fictitious defendants to recover the possession of a certificate of stock for 4,166% shares of the capital stock of the Kern Mutual Telephone Company, a corporation, and also of certain documents relating to said stock, which the plaintiff alleged had been delivered by him to said defendant corporation, and the possession of which was being unlawfully withheld by it from plaintiff, who at all times since its said delivery had been entitled thereto. The stock was alleged to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holland v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Miller v. SearsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Kendis v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Sousa v. First California Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Feisthamel v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Bailey v. Security Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API