Legal Opinion
Mulcahey v. Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 29, 1988No. 87 C 20500PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.
This action comes before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the court denies the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
NATURE OF THE CASE
The plaintiff James Mulcahey, (“Mulca-hey”) brings a three count complaint stem ming from his termination from employment with Sierra Cylinder, Inc. (“Sierra”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Hydro-Line Manufacturing Company (“Hydro-Line”). Beginning in April of 1958, the plaintiff was employed by Hydro-Line in Rockford, Illinois. In January of 1984, the plaintiff transferred to Reno, Nevada…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Patricia Babrocky v. Jewel Food Company and Retail Meatcutters Union, Local 320, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Montgomery v. Atlanta Family Restaurants, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1990
- Farr v. Continental White Cap, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Moore v. Alabama State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
- Haleck v. AgaoleatuHigh Court of American Samoa · 2003