Legal Opinion
Farr v. Continental White Cap, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 30, 1991No. 90 C 4521PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
This suit involves an age discrimination claim brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Contract claims arising under state law have been brought as well. The plaintiff in this case, A. Lawrence Farr, claims that he was constructively discharged on account of his age. Defendants Continental White Cap, Inc., Continental Can Co., Inc., and Continental Group, Inc. (collectively “White Cap”) have moved for summary judgment. Defendants assert that judgment in their favor is warranted because Farr failed to timely file his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jonah Oxman v. Wls-TvCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Walter W. Steffen v. Meridian Life Insurance Company, and Meridian Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Mull v. Arco Durethene Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farr v. Continental White Cap, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Monaco v. Fuddruckers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. IllinoisDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1994