Legal Opinion

Garland v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 10, 1920No. 8664PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Tillman County; Chas. B. Wilson, Jr., Assigned Judge. Action by A. J. Hunter against Joe Garland. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action for damages for breach of contract, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be designated “plaintiff” and “defendant,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

The petition of the plaintiff, which was quite lengthy, alleged, among other things, that the plaintiff, who was a real estate broker, and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tootle v. KentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Mellon v. FultonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. El Reno Electric Light and Telephone Co. v. JennisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  4. Puls v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. IngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Quincy Showcase Works v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Woods v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Stewart v. LudlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Toomey v. SpornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Henderson v. LoftinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API