Legal Opinion

Quincy Showcase Works v. Briscoe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 1927No. 15821PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

This appeal presents a question of pleading. In order to have a proper understanding of the matter involved, it is necessary to set forth the record requisite for that purpose.

In the trial court the parties appeared as they appear here. Plaintiff’s action against the defendant, filed on January 4, 1924, is based on a conditional sales contract, and is for a balance alleged to be due thereunder. The petition, omitting the caption, is as follows:

“Comes now the above named plaintiff, by H. P. White, its attorney, and for its cause of action against the defendants L. jay Briscoe and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ullsperger v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Crooker v. HolmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1875
  3. Goodwin v. BickfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Atkinson v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Holland v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Wilson & Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Dawson v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Toomey v. SpornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Fixico v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API