Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Ludlow

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 19, 1927No. 17516PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhelps, J.

F. C. Stewart, plaintiff in error, and Leo Ludlow, defendant in error, were each in the oil and gas brokerage business in the city of Tulsa. Stewart had a customer who desired to buy some oil property. Stewart went to Ludlow and requested Ludlow to find suitable property for sale to Stewart’s customer. Ludlow informed Stewart that he had listed and for sale certain oil property located in Osage county known as the Winemiller-Baxter property. Stewar.t negotiated a sale of this property for the sum of $700,000 and for his commission he was to receive $34,-125, half of which amount was claimed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davies v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PruittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Puls v. CaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. City of Oklahoma City v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Egan v. First Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Movants to Quash Multicounty Grand Jury Subpoena v. DixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Kurz v. StaffordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Toomey v. SpornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Pine v. Independent Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Stallings v. McIntireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API