Baines v. New Hampshire Senate President
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.
The petitioners, the Cities of Manchester and Rochester and their mayors, appeal the order of the Superior Court (McGuire, J.) denying their petition for a declaration that Laws 2004, chapter 200 is unconstitutional. We affirm.
The petitioners argue that Laws 2004, chapter 200 is unconstitutional because, as a “money bill,” the constitution requires that it originate in the New Hampshire House of Representatives (House) and because it differs materially from the bill the legislature passed. We conclude, however, based upon the facts of this case, that when this law became a “money bill,” it…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- United States v. Munoz-FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1781
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Barber v. RitterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Duquette v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- New Hampshire Health Care Ass'n v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- Associated Press v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Diana Camire v. The Gunstock Area CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.