Barber v. Ritter
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender
Introduction
In this case involving article X, section 20 of the Colorado Constitution ("Amendment 1"),1 we review the court of appeals' opinion in Barber v. Ritter, 170 P.3d 763 (Colo.App.2007).2 In that opinion, the court of appeals held that Petitioners/Cross-Respondents Douglas Barber, Heggem-Lungquist Paint Company, and Rick Kerber ("Petitioners"), as Colorado taxpayers, established standing to challenge the transfer of over $442 million from thirty-one special funds to the state's General Fund, but that the legislative acts authorizing the fund transfers did not violate article X,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lance v. CoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Marcus v. Kansas, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Ainscough v. OwensSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Lobato v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Huber v. COLORADO MINING ASS'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- Taxpayers for Public Education v. Douglas County School DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- A.B.A.T.E. of Illinois, Inc. v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.