Legal Opinion

Mutual Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1929No. 21719. En BancPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is a consolidation of two pending actions made before trial. After trial on the merits, a decree was entered fixing the priorities of the several parties in and to a certain fund which had been realT ized by a receiver’s sale of the property upon which originally the several mortgages and liens had been operative.

On this appeal, the question of priorities is alone presented.

■ While there is little dispute as to the facts, yet we find some difficulty in avoiding confusion and making a statement which will clearly present the situation of the contending parties. Perhaps the following will…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Northwest Bridge Co. v. Tacoma Shipbuilding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Colby & Dickinson, Inc. v. McCullochWashington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Harbor Millwork, Inc. v. AchttienCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  3. Olson Engineering, Inc. v. KeyBank National Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Thompson v. O'LearyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Zervas Group Architects, PS v. Bay View Tower LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API