Architectural Decorating Co. v. Nicklason
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Black, J., entered March 20, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien, after a trial on the merits before the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
Appeal from a decree denying appellant a foreclosure of a mechanics’ lien. The case is before us upon a short record, containing only the findings of fact, conclusions of law, decree, and two exhibits. The court finds that the respondents are indebted to appellant in the sum of $646, for materials furnished and labor performed in the construction of the building; that it had filed its lien in due time, but was not entitled to a foreclosure for failure to comply with Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1133, providing that a materialman must send to the owner of any building to which materials are furnished…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rieflin v. GraftonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brace & Hergert Mill Co. v. BurbankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Dominican Sisters of Ontario & German American Trust Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Hallett v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Colby & Dickinson, Inc. v. McCullochWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Hewitt-Lea Lumber Co. v. ChesleyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.