Legal Opinion
Balsam v. Trancos, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 24, 2012No. A128485; No. A129458PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARGULIES, J.
Defendant Trancos, Inc. (Trancos), appeals from a judgment awarding statutory damages and attorney fees to plaintiff Daniel L. Balsam under Business and Professions Code1 section 17529 et seq. (Anti-spam Law). Balsam cross-appeals from portions of the judgment denying him relief under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Civil Code section 1750 et seq. (CLRA), and finding Trancos’s chief executive officer (CEO), Brian Nelson, not personally liable for the judgment along with Trancos. We affirm the judgment in all respects.
I. BACKGROUND
Balsam filed suit against Trancos,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Gordon v. Virtumundo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rosolowski v. Guthy-Renker LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Silverstein v. Keynetics Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Diaz v. One Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Direct Capital Corporation v. Brooks CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Evon Martin, an individual; Dorian Medina, an individual; Shirita Moore, an individual; Keya Thornabar, an individual; Cheryl Weston; an individual, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Endurance Warranty Services, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company; and DOES 1-1,000District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.