in the Interest of A.C., J.Y., J.Y. Jr., L.B., and E.B., Children
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guzman
Proceedings to terminate the parent-child relationship implicate rights of constitutional magnitude that qualify for heightened judicial protection. Involuntary severance of parental rights thus requires "clear and convincing evidence" that termination is warranted and in the child's best interest. The intermediate proof standard is a constitutional minimum and a statutory mandate that necessitates a commensurately heightened standard of review. In this government-initiated termination proceeding, the issue is whether-under the elevated proof standard-a parent's unrecanted and uncontroverted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by371 opinions
- Todd Dyer, PHRK Intervention, Inc., PHRK Intervention, LLC, and Southside Device, LLC v. Medoc Health Services, LLC, and Total RX Care, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2019
- in the Interest of P.W., a Child v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
- In re R.J.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2019
- in the Interest of R. J, Jr., a Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019
- A. A. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2021
366 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.