Legal Opinion

In re R.J.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 2019No. 01-18-00729-CVPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaura Carter Higley, Justice

Following a bench trial, the trial court signed a judgment terminating the parent-child relationship between E.M. ("Mother") and R.J., Sr. ("Father") and their three-year-old son, "Ray."1 The trial court also appointed the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services ("the Department") to be Ray's permanent managing conservator.

Father and Mother appeal, filing separate briefs. Father presents four issues, and Mother presents two issues. Both assert that the trial court should have dismissed the suit under Family Code Section 263.401(a) because the court did not timely commence trial as…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. A. M. v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022
  2. Anum Sattar v. Ryan Z. Hazlitt, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
  3. In the Interest of A.B., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2023
  4. In the Interest of A.B.-G. and D.B., Children v. Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2024
  5. In the Interest of A.K.B., C.J.B., and M.L.A.B. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2024

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API