Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Suburban Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 21, 2002PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1047OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Philadelphia Suburban Water Company (Suburban Water) petitions for review of an adjudication of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC or Commissioners) approving several agreements by which the City of Coatesville Authority (Authority) sold its water system to the Pennsylvania-American Water Company (Pennsylvania-American).1 Specifically, Suburban Water challenges the PUC’s approval of an Asset Purchase Agreement (Agreement) that obligates Pennsylvania-American to make an annual contribution, in perpetuity, to the Coatesville Economic Development Fund in an…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re Estate of BullottaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Marazas v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Lloyd v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Ciamaichelo v. Independence Blue CrossCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.