Legal Opinion
The Wilderness Society v. Babbitt
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 23, 2000No. Civ.A. 98-2395(RWR)PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action alleging that defendants violated the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (1994), and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, by filing an inadequate Final Integrated Activity Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (“FEIS”) and by failing to address properly the environmental impact of oil and gas development in a portion of the National Petroleum Reserve planning area in Alaska (“NPR-A”). 1 Defendants move to transfer this case to the District of Alaska pursuant to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pain v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Aftab v. GonzalezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Sierra Club v. FlowersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. BosworthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- National Wildlife Federation v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Thayer/Patricof Education Funding, L.L.C. v. Pryor Resources, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.