Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of D.B.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 20, 1990No. C1-90-1868PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
By findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order filed May 23, 1990, the trial court terminated the mother’s parental rights to three children. An amended order, which contained no substantive changes, was filed May 30. This appeal was filed on August 21, and respondents Winona County and the children promptly filed motions to dismiss, arguing the appeal was untimely.
The mother’s counsel filed an untimely response to the motions to dismiss and all respondents moved to strike. The mother also seeks leave to proceed in forma pau-peris on appeal.
DEC…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schaust v. TOWN BD. OF HOLLYWOOD TP., CARVER CTY.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Boom v. BoomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Swartwoudt v. SwartwoudtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Maddox v. Department of Human Services of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re the Welfare of R.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Township of Honner v. Redwood CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- 301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- In Re the Welfare of J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Garcia v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997