Legal Opinion
Marriage of Swartwoudt v. Swartwoudt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 12, 1984No. C2-83-1665PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This appeal is from an amended judgment. There was no motion for a new trial. The time for appeal from the original judgment had run. The amended judgment did not change any of the provisions of the original judgment with respect to custody of the minor child, the sole issue raised on appeal. That issue is not reviewable as of right. The record is detailed and lengthy. The interests of justice do not require that we exercise our right of discretionary review. We affirm.
FACTS
The parties’ turbulent relationship resulted in a bitter dissolution proceeding. Custody of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- E.C.I. Corp. v. G.G.C. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Marriage of Servin v. ServinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Krug v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Dennis Frandsen & Co. v. County of KanabecSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- Marriage of Taflin v. TaflinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Balder v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Eager v. Siwek Lumber & Millwork, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Park-Lake Car Wash, Inc. v. SpringerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Carlson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.