Legal Opinion

Boom v. Boom

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 18, 1985No. C2-83-1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COYNE, Justice.

Appellant Rolland David Boom seeks' relief from the order of the Court of Appeals denying his motion to reinstate his appeal following its dismissal for failure to comply with Rule 110.02 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. Because the essential elements of Rule 110.02, subd. 1, had been timely performed and because the failure to file a certificate of transcript is not a jurisdictional defect, we reverse and remand to the Court of Appeals for reinstatement of the appeal.

On December 12, 1983, Rolland David Boom appealed from a judgment entered September…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Estates of KjorvestadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Marriage of Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. GroseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. KraayenbrinkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Marriage of Hofseth v. HofsethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API