Legal Opinion

Adams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

885 A.2d 1121 (2005)

Raymond ADAMS, Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted on Briefs July 29, 2005.

Decided November 1, 2005.

David Crowley, Bellefonte, for petitioner.

Arthur R. Thomas, Asst. Counsel and Victoria S. Freimuth, Chief Counsel, Harrisburg, for respondent.

BEFORE: SMITH-RIBNER, Judge, and SIMPSON, Judge, and JIULIANTE, Senior Judge.

OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON.

Raymond Adams petitions for review from the denial of administrative relief by the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) that recommitted him to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. McCaskill v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Cox v. Commonwealth, Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API