Legal Opinion

Cox v. Commonwealth, Board of Probation & Parole

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1985No. 19 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1984PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HUTCHINSON, Justice.

James Cox appeals by allowance Commonwealth Court’s order affirming the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole’s (Board’s) order denying him credit for time spent in an in-patient drug treatment program at Eagleville Hospital. At issue is whether appellant was, in the language of the statute, “at liberty on parole” while in that program. We are handicapped in dealing with this issue of first *616impression by a deficient factual record. Faced with those deficiencies we remand this case to the Board for development of a factual record sufficient for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Young v. Com. Bd. of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Hines v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Lock v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Haun v. CavellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Commonwealth v. MallonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Reavis v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Clair v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Adams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Figueroa v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Harden v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API