Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Turner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1988No. 122 E.D. Appeal Docket 1987PublishedCited by 3,396 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

This case requires us to set forth the appropriate procedures for the withdrawal of court-appointed counsel in collateral attacks on criminal convictions. We deem it advisable to establish a procedure which is less cumbersome than that set forth in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and Commonwealth v. McClendon, 495 Pa. 467, 434 A.2d 1185 (1981), which apply only in direct appeals from convictions.

The appellant and cross-appellee, Geary Turner, was convicted of second-degree murder in a non-jury trial before Judge…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3,396 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. WrecksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3,391 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API