Legal Opinion
Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 30, 2003No. 189 MAP 2002PublishedCited by 212 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*591 OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
James T. Martin (Appellant) appeals from an Order of the Commonwealth Court affirming an Order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) denying him administrative relief from the recalculation of his maximum term expiration date based upon his recommitment as a technical and convicted parole violator. Appellant contends that he was not accorded credit to his original sentence for one year, one month, and nineteen days of pre-trial confinement.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 30, 1985, Appellant was sentenced to a two-and-one-half to ten-year term…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Banks v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Young v. Com. Bd. of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by212 opinions
- McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Armbruster v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Montanez v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Barndt v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
207 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.