Legal Opinion
Morgan v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 22, 1987No. 141-86CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This is an action for money damages brought by Charles Morgan, a Tennessee dairy farmer, pursuant to the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (1982). Mr. Morgan alleges that the Department of Agriculture arbitrarily, capriciously and unreasonably denied his application to participate in the Milk Diversion Program authorized by the Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983, thereby abusing its discretion, violating his Fifth Amendment right to due process and equal protection of the laws and breaching a contract of unspecified origin.
FACTS
The Milk Diversion Program…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cummings v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Peter G. Grav, Arlene L. Grav, and the First National Bank in Sioux Falls v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Grav v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Baker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Brown v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.