Legal Opinion

Peter G. Grav, Arlene L. Grav, and the First National Bank in Sioux Falls v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 28, 1989No. 89-1180PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals the decision of the United States Claims Court, Grav v. United States, 14 Cl.Ct. 390 (1988), granting the Gravs’ motion for summary judgment for $50,686.00 to which they were entitled and wrongfully denied under the Milk Diversion Program (MDP), 7 U.S.C. § 1446(d) (Supp. I 1983). The Claims Court denied the United States’ (government’s) motion to dismiss and cross-motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

Background

The facts were stipulated by the parties as follows. In September, 1983, the Gravs and Ken Goodale entered into an agreement for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Madison Galleries, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  4. Grav v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  5. Morgan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. American Bankers Association v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  2. Froudi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  3. Donald D. Huston v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Agwiak, Alf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  5. Ningbo Dafa Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API